Criminal or civil? How the US handles customs violations

Mark K. Neville, Jr.
Mark K. Neville, Jr.
Principal, International Trade Counsellors, United States of America
Published 19 Nov 2025

Video locked

The video is available exclusively to our members.

Mark K. Neville, Jr. (International Trade Counsellors) explains the three regimes the United States uses to enforce customs violations, and why enforcement focus is now shifting, which is directly relevant to customs and trade compliance professionals dealing with US-bound trade.

Topics covered:

  • Criminal customs offences under Title 18 of the US Code (18 USC §§ 1541–1542) and why criminal prosecutions have historically been rare
  • The new cross-agency Trade Fraud Task Force and its focus on origin fraud
  • Civil penalties under Section 1592 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (fraud, gross negligence, negligence) and how penalty amounts are calculated
  • Prior disclosure as a way to mitigate civil penalties, and the five-year statute of limitations
  • The role of the US Court of International Trade in customs collection actions
  • The False Claims Act as a fast-growing enforcement tool, including whistleblower ("qui tam") actions and its interaction with CBP investigations

For a broader overview of the topic, please watch the full recording. The slides are available in the Resources section.

Please note that this summary was generated using AI, based on the recording and available slides.

Related content

Keeping abreast of U.S. CBP’s current strategies and developments

Keeping abreast of U.S. CBP’s current strategies and developments

Samuel Draginich
Samuel Draginich
29 May 2022

Every year U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘CBP’) releases the ‘CBP Trade and Travel Report’. Trade compliance practitioners should take note of these annual reports to keep abreast of CBP’s…

Compliance
Country update
The most unexpected customs risk that businesses faced

The most unexpected customs risk that businesses faced

Muitinės praktikų asociacija
Muitinės praktikų asociacija
18 Nov 2021

Is it possible for the business to consider all the possible customs-related risks? The answer to the poll question was unambiguous. All participants of the 8th Authors' Meeting on 21.10.2021…

Compliance
Topic spotlight
Why EU customs penalties need harmonisation

Why EU customs penalties need harmonisation

Walter Van der Meiren
Walter Van der Meiren
07 Dec 2025

Fragmentation in how EU member states enforce customs penalties undermines fairness and predictability across the customs union - this talk sets out why harmonised administrative sanctions matter for compliance professionals…

Compliance
Customs penalties in Brazil: latest developments

Customs penalties in Brazil: latest developments

Leonardo Macedo
Leonardo Macedo
19 Nov 2025

A short presentation from CustomsClear's 30th Authors' Meeting in which Leonardo Macedo, Counsellor at Brazil's Administrative Council of Tax Appeals (CARF), unpacks a Brazilian Superior Tribunal of Justice ruling that…

Compliance
Mapping customs penalties accross EU

Mapping customs penalties accross EU

Antonio Castagnini
Antonio Castagnini
18 Nov 2025

Customs penalties are not harmonised across the EU: this conference presentation by Antonio Castagnini (Greif) maps how the 27 member states differ in treating customs violations as administrative or criminal…

Compliance
Profession
Out of temperature, out of liability? A case on freight responsibility

Out of temperature, out of liability? A case on freight responsibility

Omer Wagner
Omer Wagner
16 Apr 2026

A shipment of industrial adhesive was stored at the wrong temperature resulting in damage (it was stored at minus 20 degrees instead of 20 degrees). The insurance company compensated the…

Compliance
Case law