Valuation insights from the CJEU ‘Tauritus’ case
Monika Bielskienė
Attorney at Law, Senior Manager at PwC Lithuania, and Candidate PhD at Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania
Published 31 Jul 2025
Video locked
The video is available exclusively to our members.
This recording examines the CJEU's ruling in the "Tauritus" case, a decision clarifying how customs valuation should be handled when the import price is not yet final at the time of declaration — a topic directly relevant to customs and trade compliance professionals dealing with provisional pricing arrangements.
Topics covered
- The factual background of the Tauritus case: jet fuel imports declared on a preliminary price later fixed by average fuel and currency benchmarks.
- Why the fallback valuation method was used and disputed, and when the CJEU says the transaction value method must apply instead.
- The criteria that let customs authorities accept a post-import price adjustment even though the final invoice arrives later.
- The two customs simplifications available to importers when the price at import is not yet known.
- How and why the CJEU distinguished this case from its earlier Hamamatsu ruling, and what that means for future customs valuation practice.
For a broader overview of the topic, please watch the full recording. The slides are available in the Resources section.
Please note that this summary was generated using AI, based on the recording and available slides.