Roseline Logistics v HMRC: a warning on customs agent liability

Related content
Fraudsters in the supply chain: Who pays taxes as a result of fraudulently completed formalities?
Presumption of guilt - you'll say it doesn't work that way. Unfortunately, in tax law, the taxpayer is presumed to be guilty of breaching the tax law unless he proves…
Intra-Community supply. VAT fraud. Honesty. Court practice
Earlier, in “Customs Law for Practitioners“ No. 63, we reviewed the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 20 June 2018 in Case C-108/17, to…
A wrong EORI number, and the direct customs representative is held liable for the import VAT
Editorial note. A direct customs representative inserts a wrong EORI number which does not belong to his client (the importer) and ends up being considered as customs representative without empowerment,…
US customs tariff news: July 2026
News in brief: USTR imposes Section 301 forced-labour tariffs on 60 economies, including the EU and UK, from 24 July 2026 - the EU rate is set net of the…
CJEU: claiming the wrong tariff quota does not justify double duties
What happens if an importer claims the wrong tariff quota? Can customs charge both safeguard and anti-dumping duties on the same shipment because of it? A seemingly minor procedural error…
US customs tariffs news: June 2026
News in brief: the US further adjusts its Section 232 tariffs on steel, aluminium and copper, moving agricultural and mobile industrial equipment into a reduced band and easing the US-content…