Fraudsters in the supply chain: Who pays taxes as a result of fraudulently completed formalities?

Ingrida Kemežienė
Ingrida Kemežienė
Project manager, PwC Lithuania, Lithuania
Published 24 Sep 2023
Fraudsters in the supply chain: Who pays taxes as a result of fraudulently completed formalities?
Adobe Stock
Presumption of guilt - you'll say it doesn't work that way. Unfortunately, in tax law, the taxpayer is presumed to be guilty of breaching the tax law unless he proves otherwise. The only question is whether, even if proven not guilty, the taxpayer will not have to pay the tax. In a recent judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) clarified whether the owner of an excise warehouse (whose guilt has not been proven) will have to pay the suspended taxes (in this case almost €3 million) in a case where the evidence of the completion of the formalities has been falsified and where the goods have been transported to an unknown destination. The clarifications are important not only for the owners of excise warehouses, but also for all users of suspended tax regimes - transit, customs warehousing, temporary admission for processing and others - in order to better understand, assess and manage the risks involved. The CJEU has also clarified when goods are considered "lost" and no tax is due.

Related content

Roseline Logistics v HMRC: a warning on customs agent liability

Roseline Logistics v HMRC: a warning on customs agent liability

Holly Piggott
Holly Piggott
26 Aug 2025

The article below examines a recent ruling by the UK First-tier Tax Tribunal regarding liability for unpaid import VAT. The case clarifies whether customs agents are liable if they have…

Duties & taxes
Compliance
Case law
Intra-Community supply. VAT fraud. Honesty. Court practice

Intra-Community supply. VAT fraud. Honesty. Court practice

Andrius Košel
Andrius Košel
28 Feb 2020

Earlier, in “Customs Law for Practitioners“ No. 63, we reviewed the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 20 June 2018 in Case C-108/17, to…

Duties & taxes
Compliance
Case law
A wrong EORI number, and the direct customs representative is held liable for the import VAT

A wrong EORI number, and the direct customs representative is held liable for the import VAT

Michael Lux
Michael Lux
13 Aug 2026

Editorial note. A direct customs representative inserts a wrong EORI number which does not belong to his client (the importer) and ends up being considered as customs representative without empowerment,…

Duties & taxes
Customs law
Topic spotlight
US customs tariff news: July 2026

US customs tariff news: July 2026

Editorial Board
Editorial Board
02 Aug 2026

News in brief: USTR imposes Section 301 forced-labour tariffs on 60 economies, including the EU and UK, from 24 July 2026 - the EU rate is set net of the…

Duties & taxes
News
News update
CJEU: claiming the wrong tariff quota does not justify double duties

CJEU: claiming the wrong tariff quota does not justify double duties

Editorial Board
Editorial Board
23 Jul 2026

What happens if an importer claims the wrong tariff quota? Can customs charge both safeguard and anti-dumping duties on the same shipment because of it? A seemingly minor procedural error…

Duties & taxes
News in focus
US customs tariffs news: June 2026

US customs tariffs news: June 2026

Editorial Board
Editorial Board
03 Jul 2026

News in brief: the US further adjusts its Section 232 tariffs on steel, aluminium and copper, moving agricultural and mobile industrial equipment into a reduced band and easing the US-content…

Duties & taxes
News
News update