Challenging a BTI decision: the route, the deadlines and the money

You cannot amend an unwelcome BTI or give it up - only appeal. The route, the three-year time limits for repayment, and what recent EU rulings changed.

Enrika Naujokė
Enrika Naujokė
Co-founder and Director, CustomsClear, Lithuania
Published 31 Jul 2019Updated 26 Aug 2026
Challenging a BTI decision: the route, the deadlines and the money
Adobe Stock

Customs has issued you a BTI with a code you disagree with. You cannot amend it, you cannot give it up, and applying again - in any member state - is prohibited. The only remedy is appeal. And while the appeal is pending, you keep declaring under the contested code and paying the duty. Is the appeal worth it? That depends on questions many holders ask too late. Why did one manufacturer win the 'parts' argument before the Court of Justice and still lose the case? Why did BTIs issued to other traders - even by the same customs authority - not protect an importer from a EUR 201,000 recovery claim? Why can a refund be lost simply because it was claimed after the judgment instead of during the appeal? And under which new EU ruling can a win apply from the day the BTI was issued? This article works through the whole dispute: the appeal route, the three-year time limits on repayment that run in both directions, the arguments that win and lose classification cases, and what is coming - including HS 2028, which will end every non-conforming BTI on 1 January 2028 with no period of grace.

Related content

Post-clearance value in Communication C/2026/3319: what the 76th HS Committee changes, and what to do about it

Post-clearance value in Communication C/2026/3319: what the 76th HS Committee changes, and what to do about it

Virginija Dordzikienė
Virginija Dordzikienė
12 Aug 2026

If you have already opened Communication C/2026/3319 in the Official Journal, you have seen the list. Two Explanatory Note amendments, seventeen Classification Opinions, one deletion and one Classification Decision. Codes…

Classification
Topic spotlight
Why companies need to rethink how they manage tariff classification

Why companies need to rethink how they manage tariff classification

Jakub Dobrzynski
Jakub Dobrzynski
12 Jul 2026

This article examines why tariff classification errors persist in many companies, revealing that the root cause is often not a lack of customs knowledge, but rather weak processes, poor product…

Classification
Topic spotlight
Classification of composite goods: which material decides?

Classification of composite goods: which material decides?

Enrika Naujokė
Enrika Naujokė
26 Aug 2026

Which material decides the classification of composite goods? In a recent judgment, the EU General Court gave the newest answer: decorative paper impregnated with melamine resin - declared as paper,…

Classification
Case law
View glossary entry

Combined Nomenclature (CN): the EU's 8-digit customs code

12 Aug 2026

What the Combined Nomenclature is, how an 8-digit CN code is structured, its legal basis, and how the yearly updates and the correlation table work.

Classification
HS 2028 revision: key changes and how to prepare

HS 2028 revision: key changes and how to prepare

Eglė Pučkuvienė
Eglė Pučkuvienė
29 Mar 2026

This article reviews the changes introduced in the HS 2028 revision. A total of 299 sets of amendments have been introduced, covering areas such as healthcare, epidemic control, emergency preparedness,…

Classification
Explainer
New, used, or neither? Why remanufactured goods get stuck at the border

New, used, or neither? Why remanufactured goods get stuck at the border

Enrika Naujokė
Enrika Naujokė
02 Jun 2026

An article published in this issue concerning a Court ruling on the import of worn clothing from the United Kingdom revealed a problem: the CTH rule of origin for heading…

Classification
Case law